Jefferson Street Traffic Calming

Jefferson Street Traffic Calming Project AreaIn response to neighborhood concerns about speeding traffic on Jefferson between 13th and 28th avenues and a history of traffic, we're constructing a traffic calming project late in 2020 or early next year. We'll share details of the project, which could include speed cushions on Jefferson Street, between 13th and 28th avenues, and listen to neighbors about concerns they may have.

The intent of the traffic calming project is to address speeding traffic and improve the comfort and safety of the people using the street. Jefferson Street has been identified as a Vision Zero corridor where efforts are focused to reduce crashes and improve safety for all people using the street.

We held a community meeting on February 26 where we shared more about the project (thanks to all those who came to the meeting). You can download the community presentation here. We also have an image of the approximate locations of the speed cushions.

We'll use the comments collected at the community meeting and through the comment tool below to help us inform our final decision.

What is a speed cushion?

Speed Cushion on Avalon StreetSpeed cushions slow traffic like speed humps while also allowing emergency vehicles to move through the area. We have installed speed humps in many different areas around the city including nearby Lincoln and Friendly streets.

More information about traffic calming is available at: https://www.eugene-or.gov/1729/Traffic-Calming.


Jefferson Street Traffic Calming Project AreaIn response to neighborhood concerns about speeding traffic on Jefferson between 13th and 28th avenues and a history of traffic, we're constructing a traffic calming project late in 2020 or early next year. We'll share details of the project, which could include speed cushions on Jefferson Street, between 13th and 28th avenues, and listen to neighbors about concerns they may have.

The intent of the traffic calming project is to address speeding traffic and improve the comfort and safety of the people using the street. Jefferson Street has been identified as a Vision Zero corridor where efforts are focused to reduce crashes and improve safety for all people using the street.

We held a community meeting on February 26 where we shared more about the project (thanks to all those who came to the meeting). You can download the community presentation here. We also have an image of the approximate locations of the speed cushions.

We'll use the comments collected at the community meeting and through the comment tool below to help us inform our final decision.

What is a speed cushion?

Speed Cushion on Avalon StreetSpeed cushions slow traffic like speed humps while also allowing emergency vehicles to move through the area. We have installed speed humps in many different areas around the city including nearby Lincoln and Friendly streets.

More information about traffic calming is available at: https://www.eugene-or.gov/1729/Traffic-Calming.


Do you have a comment about the project? Share your comment here and we'll use it to inform our final decision. Comments will be open until April 3.

You need to be signed in to comment in this Guest Book. Click here to Sign In or Register to get involved

I support traffic calming on Jefferson Street. I'd also like to see marked and protected pedestrian crossing at 15th Avenue, where the Amazon Creek bicycle and pedestrian routes cross Jefferson, as you have at Broadway. I suspect that this too would contribute to slowing traffic.

PaulVHoward 5 days ago

I bike Jefferson every day and people drive way way too fast on this street. There aren't enough speed limit signs to remind people to slow down. Speed cushions might help, but we're concerned that traffic then will spill over into other neighborhood streets. We're wondering why there isn't a stop light at Jefferson and W 28th Ave. Seems like that would take some of the stress out of using such a major arterial, and it would improve intersection safety. Drivers might accept the speed cushions more readily if they knew they had a light up ahead at 28th.

Janel 14 days ago

I oppose this measure. Street is a major arterial. Instead add one or two protected crosswalks, like at 24th (I think).

Frank Gibson 15 days ago

Dear Jefferson Traffic Calming TeamThe city's efforts to calm traffic on Jefferson are extremely appreciated! We live on Jefferson and have 2 school aged children, one attending Adams, one attending Roosevelt. They both had more than one close call, crossing Jefferson, and even just crossing 23rd along Jefferson. The current combination of volume of traffic and tolerated speeds is just not safe, and it's only a question of time for something terrible to happen. I would encourage you to consider whatever it takes to bring speeds down close the posted 25mph. At this speed the common driver may loose 30 seconds of their precious time, but it seems a reasonably small price in light of the benefits to all users and residents of Jefferson St. alike. I understand that budget is an issue, and speed cushions are the measure of choice in the current plans. I would, however, strongly encourage you to consider other, cheap, accompanying measures (i.e. tactical urbanism) to complement and/or substitute some of the speed cushions. A main issue is that Jefferson is a wide, straight street, which in sections where street parking is rare invites/enables speeding. There are cheap options like "curb extensions" with reflective plastic poles and street markings, which will narrow the line of sight, and place pedestrians that want to cross in a visible yet protected position. These would be even more effective in combination with marked crosswalks. And even more effective, if they would be combined with interrupting straight line of traffic, by forcing it to meander from side to side (most effectively in combination with street parking arrangements). Regarding street parking, I know it's a controversial issue. But people are afraid that street parking would be taken away from them entirely. This would not at all be necessary, as meandering traffic flow would only have to remove halve of the street parking. This would leave ample parking space in most sections of Jefferson, and the feasible sections could easily be identified by some parking surveys (and allocating 1 or 2 street parking slots per property). It would be fair for residents to raise their concerns based on concrete project plans, rather than just dismiss this option based on anecdotal resistance.Lastly, an uphill bike lane from 18th to 24th would be an efficient way to narrow Jefferson, which would slow down traffic as well (I have shared a detailed proposal via email). This bike lane would provide an important connection for the Friendly neighborhood in direction down town - and serve the goal of calming traffic. All these measure require minimal infrastructure investments and should therefore be within reach of the available budget. I would encourage you to consider a broader range of measures than speed cushions, hopefully in close collaboration/communication with residents, and share your assessments of the various options. It would be particularly helpful to learn about the reasons why some measures may not be considered (i.e. due to cost, code or other issues). Thanks again for all your efforts. I would be happy to respond to any questions you may have regarding my suggestions. Thomas GotschiTransportation and Health ConsultantResearcher at PPPM, University of Oregongotom22@gmail.com

Gotom22 18 days ago